Analog film photography and cameras

You are reading a single comment by @salad and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

IR in reply to @salad

I actually got some cinestill back yesterday and it was horribly grainy, I shot it at 640 ISO and had it developed as normal. Hoping it's just bad scanning but I won't be able to scan it myself until I replace my computer.

CNV00021 by 40 skid patches, on Flickr

CNV00026 by 40 skid patches, on Flickr

CNV00002 by 40 skid patches, on Flickr

CNV00014 by 40 skid patches, on Flickr

Shot a mini project on umbrellas in the west end but I can't tell if the shots are pure shit as well as the scans, I guess only time will tell.

•

salad in reply to @IR

...sorry if I'm being thick, but are those shots up there the Cine Still ones you mentioned ?

Don't look that grainy to me, and the colours look too "ordinary" for Cine Still (though I guess this is automatically corrected quick-lab scans).

•

IR in reply to @salad

Yup Cinestill shot with an 85b (if memory serves) filter, maybe grainy isn't the right word but they look over sharpened and a bit speckled on my screen, more so than other film I've had scanned at that jessops.

About

Avatar for salad @salad started