-
• #42802
^ unobtrusive colours.
this is bike is so cool.
-
• #42803
No
-
• #42804
And risers ;P
-
• #42805
still a visp ;)
-
• #42806
would only really have them rotors like
-
• #42807
-
• #42808
More faux/bro than lo...
-
• #42809
one of my favourites of yours pancake
-
• #42810
What with the skinny downtube?
-
• #42811
Not a fan of forks being wider than the frame tubing...
-
• #42813
I think the wheel graphics have fucked you up in the head ;)
-
• #42814
How can you go through the whole alphabet and miss out P for Pinarello! (RW)
1 Attachment
-
• #42815
-
• #42816
Haha, yeah, the wheels are a bit out there, some box sections would set it off nicely
-
• #42817
That bike is odd. That fork looks like it's on backwards.
-
• #42818
The Rosko?
-
• #42819
Just a wing pista.
-
• #42820
The Rosko forks aren't Wing Pista's, but you maybe talking about Andy's bike...
-
• #42821
What Rosko?
-
• #42823
I'm talking about the bike sirbikealot posted
-
• #42824
whilst on the topic of 700c lopros...
-
• #42825
horizontal top tube lo pro? You mean track bikes with too small frames? That is quite hhsb.
joining in on the 700cx700c lo pro readers wives..