-
•
- Neither rim brakes nor the dynamo demand a "machined rim" but a rim with, more or less, a braking surface, viz. more or less parallel rim walls. The surface on machined rims wears down anyway rather quickly. Classical bad weather rims such as the Ambrosio Nemesis don't have machined sidewalls. There is nothing about the design of the dynamo that I see could require machining--- if so it would quickly start to fail as the rim surface starts to wear down.
- The rim wall does not even need to be very deep--- less demands that most "modern" shoes.
- Water? A machined surface is not more immune to water films.
- Apparently a large number of people are using the dynamo for long distance touring. According to the maker "It works slip-free and with unobtrusive reliability even in the wet". I see no reason not to believe that claim.
- I can see some problems in extreme cold, snow, mud etc. but that is where the accumulator based solutions come to bloom: lights are powered by a battery that is charged by the dynamo.
- Neither rim brakes nor the dynamo demand a "machined rim" but a rim with, more or less, a braking surface, viz. more or less parallel rim walls. The surface on machined rims wears down anyway rather quickly. Classical bad weather rims such as the Ambrosio Nemesis don't have machined sidewalls. There is nothing about the design of the dynamo that I see could require machining--- if so it would quickly start to fail as the rim surface starts to wear down.
-
Neither rim brakes nor the dynamo demand a "machined rim" but a rim with, more or less, a braking surface
My tourer uses disc brakes and all mountain carbon rims that have no braking surface or machined rim, no aluminium around the edge, and were designed for disc brakes and the walls are explicitly thin carbon and not designed for any rubbing or braking action.
Velogical put their limitation there for a good reason, and Enve Composites put similar limitations on their product for a good reason. I'll listening to those above all else.