Sorry @The_Kindness_of_Trees, by a third party kinda way maybe you mean you are one of the funders listed...? So it isn't my intention to piss on your chips.
It is not my intention to rubbish the idea, it is more that the idea is not articulated anywhere and so the website is confused/confusing and appears to be style over substance where there is a poorly thought through statement and a list of people it took to came up with it.
Maybe you could give us the basics of the offer/product?
Ha Ha - no, not all. The company I work for has been approached by VanHawk because they want to use some of the small components we sell - it's boring stuff.
As such, I'm reluctant to offer an opinion on the project - suffice to say, I like my cycling kept simple.
Sorry @The_Kindness_of_Trees, by a third party kinda way maybe you mean you are one of the funders listed...? So it isn't my intention to piss on your chips.
It is not my intention to rubbish the idea, it is more that the idea is not articulated anywhere and so the website is confused/confusing and appears to be style over substance where there is a poorly thought through statement and a list of people it took to came up with it.
Maybe you could give us the basics of the offer/product?