IMO the 65+ are more entitle to the a vote than the 16-17 year olds as they for a kick off haven't contributed anything to society yet(Money wise) unlike the 65+ who will have paid tax all throughout theres.
Plus the 16-17 years aren't allowed to vote normally and won't be on the next general election, so it was Alex Salmond twisting it with the hope that it would pay off and that table above I'd love to the see the numbers of people actually asked on each age cat.
The 'data' on 16-17 year old voting pattern is from a sample size of 14, so it is meaningless in any event. In addition 18-24 year olds were majority No, according to the same poll:
IMO the 65+ are more entitle to the a vote than the 16-17 year olds as they for a kick off haven't contributed anything to society yet(Money wise) unlike the 65+ who will have paid tax all throughout theres.
Plus the 16-17 years aren't allowed to vote normally and won't be on the next general election, so it was Alex Salmond twisting it with the hope that it would pay off and that table above I'd love to the see the numbers of people actually asked on each age cat.