when the opposition point blank refuses to engage with the issues beyond saying 'no' or predicting armageddon it's hard to have much of a debate in good faith, isn't it?
And where Yes was going on expectations it was made clear that a definite answer couldn't be given but that they explained their thinking as to how they reached a balance of probability. For a lot of people the difference in approach was enough to sway them.
when the opposition point blank refuses to engage with the issues beyond saying 'no' or predicting armageddon it's hard to have much of a debate in good faith, isn't it?
And where Yes was going on expectations it was made clear that a definite answer couldn't be given but that they explained their thinking as to how they reached a balance of probability. For a lot of people the difference in approach was enough to sway them.