You are reading a single comment by @big_daddy_wayne and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Ok Luke - I'll engage

    The fundamental flaw, for me, on your theories about coffee is that you are positing that there is a singular, scientific procedure to producing the very best coffee.

    The problem with that theory is you're applying a quantitive [science of making coffee] to a qualititive/subjective [dictates of personal taste]

    Just because you think a process or a roaster makes the perfect coffee doesn't make that assumption correct, and inflexibility inhibits discovery

    Now if you rock up and say 'dude, I've found this awesome roaster and I've been having a crack at it and try it at this grind, this water temp' then it's game on for me, happy to try something new.

    If your recommendations are based on a dismissal of other methods or opinions then I'll do what I'd do with any other fundamentalist, and ignore it.

    I'm sure you've got some great insights and opinions - but share, don't preach, be willing to be proved wrong

About