"Mr Smith, a paramedic, is campaigning for a law to force cyclists to wear helmets. The teenager was not wearing a bike helmet when he collided with a van while cycling to work."
Victim blaming much? all the reporting around it is about how "he didn't want to wear a helmet because it might ruin his hair." What about the van that he collided with, would he have miraculously swerved to avoid a collision if he was wearing a magical helmet?
He's a hypocritical wanker too - he claims on his Facebook page that he's not campaigning to make helmets compulsory, so won't enter into a debate on the merits of making them compulsory. And if you disagree with him, your post gets deleted and you get called a troll.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-29009489
"Mr Smith, a paramedic, is campaigning for a law to force cyclists to wear helmets. The teenager was not wearing a bike helmet when he collided with a van while cycling to work."
Victim blaming much? all the reporting around it is about how "he didn't want to wear a helmet because it might ruin his hair." What about the van that he collided with, would he have miraculously swerved to avoid a collision if he was wearing a magical helmet?