-
• #52
It's an animated .gif that makes that possible.
I'm not going to do use an animated favicon though.
-
• #53
Fair enough.
I can see an animated favicon getting pretty annoying pretty fast. -
• #54
lfgss cap?
-
• #55
^Hadn't noticed the second and third pages. Looks as though I'm late to the party and everyone is already drunk on aerospok.
-
• #56
Arrospokk looks like a Trivial Pursuit cheesewheel.
-
• #57
Arrospokk looks like a Trivial Pursuit cheesewheel.
+1 much 2007.
-
• #58
Arrospok looks a bit shit at tiny tab size in firefox (browser of choice at work). Forum colour stripes as per cap would look better, I think. Could someone make this exist? Spok looks slightly better on dolphin browser on s3.
-
• #59
+1 much 2007.
Pffff! It's our heritage...
-
• #60
Yup - not keen
-
• #62
Nice
-
• #63
Cap stripes.
1 Attachment
-
• #64
-
• #65
I like our new not-M favicon. I thought that it was some sort of weird flower. Now that I know that is a spokkk I like it better. It should be a double spok though for better aeros as per @mdcc_tester.
-
• #66
Yes.
My fave t shirt.
-
• #67
Although actually, arrospok or cap stripes.
-
• #68
The little Bropro from my <<< would be cool too
-
• #69
reminds me of this -
• #70
Favicon surely has to be Pengy
-
• #71
Favicons must be sycophant to the url
-
• #72
Like it.
-
• #73
I like it too
-
• #74
because it's vegan, gender neutral, has tattoos and drinks posh espresso?
-
• #75
has anyone else noticed that the favicon for chrome when viewing source is the M vs the ☸? Why is that? The console doesn't list any other requests for favicon (after the Favicon files were deleted). I read that it might have something to do with it not being stored as an .ico. Anybody know better what the browser is doing here?
Yeah, I've seen moving favicons somewhere. Impressive.