In the news

I'm yet to hear/read any kind of moral or ethical argument that in any way justifies the appallingly high civilian and children death count in Gaza. Any time the question is raised, the argument immediately gets deflected into rockets, security, borders, '67, militants, human shields, tunnels, anti-semite, no you're a cunt, blah... All bullshit and deflection as far as I'm concerned. FFS!

At what point/percentage/count will Israelis themselves (let alone the international community) say it is too high? 80% civilian? It has passed that. I truly despair.

This.

It's fucking obviously terrorism, land theft and slum clearance. Fucking wake up. They want the Gaza Strip for themselves. They are clearly not merely defending themselves. The futile rocket attacks give them exactly the excuse they need to unleash their ultimate objective.

Slippery cunts.

If they were genuinely interested in defending themselves, they wouldn't be committing atrocities that will only make the rest of the Middle East hate them even more than they already do. Total hogwash.

My question however is this: why don't Hamas stop firing rockets? They're achieving nothing and provide the Israeli regime with an excuse to fuck Palestine over completely. If it was seen to be the one-sided aggressive occupation that it clearly is, surely Israel's allies would be forced to hold them accountable to some extent.