In the news

a Anarcho-Syndalists

A owls?

Anarchowl-Syndowlists.

A Anarchowl-Syndowlists.

Um, so is the IDF going to provide the evidence that each and every one of these houses had a Hamas rocket launcher in it?
I didn't manage to embed the interactive versions of this image, but there are loads more of these around the interwebs.

is there anything left to bomb
they are razing it to the ground block by block

^ That appears to be the plan.

When is anyone going to do anything meaningful about it? Another UN school has been bombed. The power station is fucked. The Gazans are being killed off. This is abhorrent.

A poll published by Tel Aviv university on Tuesday found 95% of Israeli Jews felt the offensive was justified. Only 4% believed too much force had been used.

From the guardian today.

WTF Israel???

Good old Israel bombing schools again

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/30/gaza-another-un-school-hit-in-further-night-of-fierce-bombardment

They really are a bunch of fucking cunts

It's never gonna end until Palestine cease to exist, which appear to be their intention.

Give them an inch, they'll run a miles, shame there's nothing we can do about it.

^^^I always try to be fair by talking about 'the Israeli regime' instead of 'Israel' or 'Israelis'. But with this, why even fucking bother?

treat them like south africa of the 70's and 80's
boycott israeli produce, is a good way to start i suppose it eventually worked there, but governments were onside

admittedly they receive gazillions from america so it won't do much

They really are a bunch of fucking cunts

How very British of you. Throwing bombs on other people's fields. Instead let's be fair and make Mohammed Junaid Babar and Sajeel Shahid heros and collect money so that guys like Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale don't have to use such crude weapons to slit English throats... Its really not fair that Kafeel Ahmed had to use primitive propane canisters and not something better...

^ reductionist, diversionary horseshit. 2/10.

^^ Oh do fuck off

How very British of you. Throwing bombs on other people's fields. Instead let's be fair and make Mohammed Junaid Babar and Sajeel Shahid heros and collect money so that guys like Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale don't have to use such crude weapons to slit English throats... Its really not fair that Kafeel Ahmed had to use primitive propane canisters and not something better...

Killing by individuals with other allegiances doesn't justify the disproportionate genocidal response executed by the Israeli regime.

Stop being such a cunt.

I'm yet to hear/read any kind of moral or ethical argument that in any way justifies the appallingly high civilian and children death count in Gaza. Any time the question is raised, the argument immediately gets deflected into rockets, security, borders, '67, militants, human shields, tunnels, anti-semite, no you're a cunt, blah... All bullshit and deflection as far as I'm concerned. FFS!

At what point/percentage/count will Israelis themselves (let alone the international community) say it is too high? 80% civilian? It has passed that. I truly despair.

More deflection >>>>>

How very British of you. Throwing bombs on other people's fields. Instead let's be fair and make Mohammed Junaid Babar and Sajeel Shahid heros and collect money so that guys like Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale don't have to use such crude weapons to slit English throats... Its really not fair that Kafeel Ahmed had to use primitive propane canisters and not something better...

I'm yet to hear/read any kind of moral or ethical argument that in any way justifies the appallingly high civilian and children death count in Gaza. Any time the question is raised, the argument immediately gets deflected into rockets, security, borders, '67, militants, human shields, tunnels, anti-semite, no you're a cunt, blah... All bullshit and deflection as far as I'm concerned. FFS!

At what point/percentage/count will Israelis themselves (let alone the international community) say it is too high? 80% civilian? It has passed that. I truly despair.

The moral or ethical argument is: Hamas is using them as human shields and/or they (civilians) have been warned they are going to be bombarded, so should leave (to UN buildings perhaps? Oh.).

Or if you take the more extreme view of some - there are no civilians (a view held by some in Knesset).

The moral or ethical argument is: Hamas is using them as human shields and/or they (civilians) have been warned they are going to be bombarded, so should leave (to UN buildings perhaps? Oh.).

Or if you take the more extreme view of some - there are no civilians (a view held by some in Knesset).

The State of Israel has been trying to clear out Palestinians for decades, so why would a leaflet make them run away?

and run away to where, exactly?

How very British of you. Throwing bombs on other people's fields. Instead let's be fair and make Mohammed Junaid Babar and Sajeel Shahid heros and collect money so that guys like Michael Adebolajo and Michael Adebowale don't have to use such crude weapons to slit English throats... Its really not fair that Kafeel Ahmed had to use primitive propane canisters and not something better...

Not sure if what you have written is English or really what you are talking about

I'm yet to hear/read any kind of moral or ethical argument that in any way justifies the appallingly high civilian and children death count in Gaza. Any time the question is raised, the argument immediately gets deflected into rockets, security, borders, '67, militants, human shields, tunnels, anti-semite, no you're a cunt, blah... All bullshit and deflection as far as I'm concerned. FFS!

At what point/percentage/count will Israelis themselves (let alone the international community) say it is too high? 80% civilian? It has passed that. I truly despair.

Seems to me that the broad Israeli attitude is that Palestinians are a sub species and their demise is sport. They have demonised them and properly muddled their logic in the same way that EddyZ seems to be managing to demionise muslims or arabs based on the madnesses of a few.

Bellends everyfuckingwhere.

We've done some shitty things as a nation but I don't recall getting the popcorn out during shock and awe. Is it even possible that most Israelis are just looking at this as a practical solution to an inconvenient (albeit terrible and terrifying) problem? What in the name of fuck is the UN even for? Someone needs to hold a very large mirror up to this shit.

Someone needs to travel back to the sixties and start holding a big fucking mirror up actually. We were knee deep in the shit decades ago.

is EdwardZ an estate agent?

too eloquent and knowledgeable surely

I'm yet to hear/read any kind of moral or ethical argument that in any way justifies the appallingly high civilian and children death count in Gaza. Any time the question is raised, the argument immediately gets deflected into rockets, security, borders, '67, militants, human shields, tunnels, anti-semite, no you're a cunt, blah... All bullshit and deflection as far as I'm concerned. FFS!

At what point/percentage/count will Israelis themselves (let alone the international community) say it is too high? 80% civilian? It has passed that. I truly despair.

This.

It's fucking obviously terrorism, land theft and slum clearance. Fucking wake up. They want the Gaza Strip for themselves. They are clearly not merely defending themselves. The futile rocket attacks give them exactly the excuse they need to unleash their ultimate objective.

Slippery cunts.

If they were genuinely interested in defending themselves, they wouldn't be committing atrocities that will only make the rest of the Middle East hate them even more than they already do. Total hogwash.

My question however is this: why don't Hamas stop firing rockets? They're achieving nothing and provide the Israeli regime with an excuse to fuck Palestine over completely. If it was seen to be the one-sided aggressive occupation that it clearly is, surely Israel's allies would be forced to hold them accountable to some extent.

The moral or ethical argument is: Hamas is using them as human shields and/or they (civilians) have been warned they are going to be bombarded, so should leave (to UN buildings perhaps? Oh.).

The human shield argument has been dismissed by many journalists. Even if true, all it says is fuck you. I don't believe that represents a moral or ethical argument to continue.

Or if you take the more extreme view of some - there are no civilians (a view held by some in Knesset).

That view also extends to children? We are doomed.

For the record I don't give a shit about the 'history'. Pretty much every nation has done some really nasty stuff. It doesn't give license to continue now.