But his conclusion is the analysis doesn't prove or disprove doping. He notes the assumptions and any known values.
"plausible, but at the limit, and comparable to doped riders."
Blame the dopers for creating a whole world of people that no longer trust pro cycling performances.
But his conclusion is the analysis doesn't prove or disprove doping. He notes the assumptions and any known values.
"plausible, but at the limit, and comparable to doped riders."
Blame the dopers for creating a whole world of people that no longer trust pro cycling performances.