39mph in a 20 zone. The driver's sentence was cut on appeal to 12 months.
Leaving aside the joke of a sentence, for an uninsured speeding driver who killed a child, that case illustrates the law of inintended consequences. The driver in that case lost control on a speed bump. If the road had not been in a 20mph zone but in a 20mph limit there would have been no speed bump and the crash may not have happened.
I hope therefore that if we now have borough-wide 20mph limits there's no longer any need for the 'zones' with their "self enforcing" road hazards, and all that stuff gets removed. It can be replaced with actual enforcement.
Leaving aside the joke of a sentence, for an uninsured speeding driver who killed a child, that case illustrates the law of inintended consequences. The driver in that case lost control on a speed bump. If the road had not been in a 20mph zone but in a 20mph limit there would have been no speed bump and the crash may not have happened.
I hope therefore that if we now have borough-wide 20mph limits there's no longer any need for the 'zones' with their "self enforcing" road hazards, and all that stuff gets removed. It can be replaced with actual enforcement.