But she was made to pay the restaurant money because she gave a bad review though right?
I don't understand all that legal claptrap above.
she represented herself, and it was only a preliminary injunction that can create no legal precedent and, if appealed, would according to the lawyer quoted, be thrown out.
basically, woman writes shit review, restaurant man goes in huff. restaurant man paid lawyer, woman didn't. Man won. Woman paid man, went in huff, can't be arsed appealing.
she represented herself, and it was only a preliminary injunction that can create no legal precedent and, if appealed, would according to the lawyer quoted, be thrown out.
basically, woman writes shit review, restaurant man goes in huff. restaurant man paid lawyer, woman didn't. Man won. Woman paid man, went in huff, can't be arsed appealing.