Nonotever, it is irrelevant to state the controversy section since we have never reinforced 'price fixing' and simply encouraged our recommended retail prices to ensure a consistent pricing structure. We are in talks with Bikebiz at the moment since we have never 'forbidden' our resellers to discount our RRPs as specified on the Bikebiz article that you are referring to, and our trade terms and conditions have never mentioned this. So although this article has created quite some heat, it is inaccurate, so the fact that you added this onto our wiki page is irrelevant and might have defamatory implications which we will not tolerate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.184.24 (talk) 10:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
We all know how much Dani loves his 'legal action' so I wonder if he will be pursuing BikeBiz for publishing the allegedly inaccurate information.
On the Talk:Foffa Bikes page,
We all know how much Dani loves his 'legal action' so I wonder if he will be pursuing BikeBiz for publishing the allegedly inaccurate information.