Foffa Bikes

non-flushable

apt

Pretty good turd. Decent length, rich colour and the correct shape - even with the "nip" at the end.

Looks like an eye-waterer though...

8/10

Yes. Type 4 on the official Bristol Stool scale

Certified BESPOKE TURD Foffa shirt

True story.

The Most Epic Story of All Time - YouTube

Danni Foffa ??

Could be,I heard Dani Foffa is now hiding in a cave in TORA BORA

stanley tucci aicmfp.

stanley tucci aicmfp.

Close, but no cigar, Greenhell

'fraid the £5 is not coming your way today

It appears the wiki article has been heavily re edited.

There is a conscientious editor undoing Dannii's revisions every time he makes them. Dannii doesn't yet seem to understand that a Wikipedia article about him is not his to edit, and he keeps logging in from new addresses as fast as he gets banned and blocked.

Not his to edit lmao,he wrote it in the first place,along with his SELFMADEHEROES page.

Your recent edits to Talk:Foffa Bikes could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Foffa Bikes. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 10:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
.

Lol

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 10:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC).

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (June 2014)

No shit...

No shit...

Are you sure about this statement, in this thread, on this subject?

@joeym,you witty git,ive just fallen in on the joke in your last post...Danni Foffa talks shit,designs shit and this thread is full of shit

There is a conscientious editor undoing Dannii's revisions every time he makes them. Dannii doesn't yet seem to understand that a Wikipedia article about him is not his to edit, and he keeps logging in from new addresses as fast as he gets banned and blocked.

Well done to the "conscientious" editor !! wink wink

This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find links tool for suggestions. (November 2013)

Nobody has posted a link to the Foffa page as an example on the Streisand Effect page?

Well done to the "conscientious" editor !! wink wink

No, not me, but every time Dannii removes the bits I wrote, a kind person reverts them straight back in.

Wait what...

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:BlockList&action=search&ip=Danifoffa

On the Talk:Foffa Bikes page,

Nonotever, it is irrelevant to state the controversy section since we have never reinforced 'price fixing' and simply encouraged our recommended retail prices to ensure a consistent pricing structure. We are in talks with Bikebiz at the moment since we have never 'forbidden' our resellers to discount our RRPs as specified on the Bikebiz article that you are referring to, and our trade terms and conditions have never mentioned this. So although this article has created quite some heat, it is inaccurate, so the fact that you added this onto our wiki page is irrelevant and might have defamatory implications which we will not tolerate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.184.24 (talk) 10:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

We all know how much Dani loves his 'legal action' so I wonder if he will be pursuing BikeBiz for publishing the allegedly inaccurate information.

Since BikeBiz will have recorded the interview (standard practice) and will be able very simply to prove what Dani said, I very much doubt Dani will do anything at all. His attempts at the old 'reverse ferret' manoeuvre are as inept as his understanding of the Streisand Effect.

Talks with BikeBiz lmao Dani look where got you last time.

Re-reading the posts relating to the Wiki entry, am I right in assuming that the original article was published by Tyson Sadlo and Dani Foffa or under their specific instruction with their full editorial direction and control?

Am I wrong to assume that this is wholeheartedly against the principles of Wikimedia/Wikipedia?

So anyway I'm still not sure about fabric softener, unfortunately we were mid discussion elsewhere and got cut off... Is it actually bad for you?