if you are trying to say you agreed with the law and opinions expressed in this thread regarding the law you certainly appeared to not do so
Possibly because those are two separate questions.
I agree with the opinions expressed in this thread regarding the law, i.e. that the quotation attributed to Foffa in the BikeBiz article is an admission that Foffa's contractual terms are in breach of the prevailing law.
I disagree with the law; I think it's unnecessary. In general, unnecessary law empowers governments, oppresses citizens and suppresses economic activity, all things which I think are a bad thing.
Possibly because those are two separate questions.
I agree with the opinions expressed in this thread regarding the law, i.e. that the quotation attributed to Foffa in the BikeBiz article is an admission that Foffa's contractual terms are in breach of the prevailing law.
I disagree with the law; I think it's unnecessary. In general, unnecessary law empowers governments, oppresses citizens and suppresses economic activity, all things which I think are a bad thing.