Incorrect sir. That Vivalo in the picture is mine and it is in fact NJS -stamped. You cant take the stamp away although Vivalo lost their certificate for one crown failure in some crash. And that Gayas belongs to my better half and here is some info concerning the frame (and I guess nobody implicated that the frame is NJS)..:
"Gayas is possibly the first Korean track frame company ever established. They were sponsored by one of major company in Korea called Sun-kyung (SK) and built track frames for U.S.A. Olympic Track Team for Seoul Olympics 1988. Most of Gayas frames has double butted Tange tubing and Suntour track-ends. They are built prestigiously to highest standard. Gayas disappeared in early to mid 1990s and their frames are therefore extremely rare to find in any condition (even in Korea)." About the same is this: http://www.pedalroom.com/bike/gayas-korean-keirin-build-12152
"..The seller was actually able to track down the original builder (http://www.youngcycle.com) who built this in the 80s and have him restore it. Young Cycle builds all the Cello, 3rensho and Kalavinka frames for Korean Kerin."
rotten_prims
Dunno about the disgrace you are talking about..haters gonna hate.
Well some people do it differently. And if that is disgrace to you, it is your opinion. For me, it is not a surprise that the Anchor would be the most "acceptable" of these particular builds shown in the picture. I like all of them, they are all nice bikes and people have put them together to be appealing to themselves, hopefully. White and sky/baby-blueish on Levan works nicely with those white tires and rims and lime green tires work nicely with the chameleon paint and lime green head badge that Gayas has. This is my opinion.
Welcome to HHSB :)
Don't know about logos or stamps, but white rims and white tyres is a disgrace. And green tyres for that matter. Though the Anchor looks like a really nice build.
naah your wrong, there should be no coloured tyres
Welcome to HHSB :)
+1
No one's wrong, it's just...wrong thread xD