The hub of the wheel is its central point, or anchor. It determines forty percent of a wheel's stiffness and compliance
My BS detector kicked off at this in the first paragraph after the intro. Forty percent of what? Are hubless wheels only ever going to be 60% as stiff as ones with hubs?
And this:
a stiff spoke (one that resists bending) decreases side-to-side deflection and at the same time decreases vertical deflection, whereas a flexible spoke (one that is easily bent) decreases side-to-side deflection and increases vertical deflection.
Is utter bullshit too, as long as we're considering spokes which always have at least some tension in them under all service conditions. For a spoke's bending stiffness to be in play, at least a part of the spoke's cross section has to be in compression, and then we're talking about either a wire spoked wheel which has already failed or a solid wheel like a HED3 or Arospok.
Paul Lew is obviously a clever bloke, but either he knows nothing about wheels or he has dumbed the article down so far for a lay audience that it has become meaningless drivel in the process.
My BS detector kicked off at this in the first paragraph after the intro. Forty percent of what? Are hubless wheels only ever going to be 60% as stiff as ones with hubs?
And this:
Is utter bullshit too, as long as we're considering spokes which always have at least some tension in them under all service conditions. For a spoke's bending stiffness to be in play, at least a part of the spoke's cross section has to be in compression, and then we're talking about either a wire spoked wheel which has already failed or a solid wheel like a HED3 or Arospok.
Paul Lew is obviously a clever bloke, but either he knows nothing about wheels or he has dumbed the article down so far for a lay audience that it has become meaningless drivel in the process.